RFC 2096
IP Forwarding Table MIB, January 1997
- File formats:
- Status:
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Obsoletes:
- RFC 1354
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4292
- Author:
- F. Baker
- Stream:
- IETF
- Source:
- ospf (rtg)
Cite this RFC: TXT | XML | BibTeX
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2096
Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list lsr@ietf.org
Other actions: Submit Errata | Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF | View History of RFC 2096
Abstract
This memo defines an update to RFC 1354. The significant difference between this MIB and RFC 1354 is the recognition (explicitly discussed but by consensus left to future work) that CIDR routes may have the same network number but different network masks. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.
For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.