RFC 1675

Security Concerns for IPng, August 1994

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML
S. Bellovin

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML

DOI:  10.17487/RFC1675

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to iesg@ietf.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF


A number of the candidates for IPng have some features that are somewhat worrisome from a security perspective. While it is not necessary that IPng be an improvement over IPv4, it is mandatory that it not make things worse. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.

For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.