Cite this BCP: TXT  |  XML

BCP 89 contains the following RFCs:
NumberFilesTitleAuthorsDateMore InfoStatus
RFC 3819, BCP 89ASCII, PDF Advice for Internet Subnetwork Designers P. Karn, Ed., C. Bormann, G. Fairhurst, D. Grossman, R. Ludwig, J. Mahdavi, G. Montenegro, J. Touch, L. WoodJuly 2004Updated by RFC 9599, ErrataBest Current Practice
RFC 9599, BCP 89ASCII, PDFGuidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IPB. Briscoe, J. KaippallimalilAugust 2024Updates RFC 3819Best Current Practice

Abstract of RFC 3819

This document provides advice to the designers of digital communication equipment, link-layer protocols, and packet-switched local networks (collectively referred to as subnetworks), who wish to support the Internet protocols but may be unfamiliar with the Internet architecture and the implications of their design choices on the performance and efficiency of the Internet. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Abstract of RFC 9599

The purpose of this document is to guide the design of congestion notification in any lower-layer or tunnelling protocol that encapsulates IP. The aim is for explicit congestion signals to propagate consistently from lower-layer protocols into IP. Then, the IP internetwork layer can act as a portability layer to carry congestion notification from non-IP-aware congested nodes up to the transport layer (L4). Specifications that follow these guidelines, whether produced by the IETF or other standards bodies, should assure interworking among IP-layer and lower-layer congestion notification mechanisms. This document is included in BCP 89 and updates the single paragraph of advice to subnetwork designers about Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) in Section 13 of RFC 3819 by replacing it with a reference to this document.


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search