RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 9539, "Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted Recursive-to-Authoritative DNS", February 2024
Source of RFC: dprive (int)
Errata ID: 7831
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Kevin P. Fleming
Date Reported: 2024-02-29
Verifier Name: Paul Wouters
Date Verified: 2024-03-04
Section 4.6.1 says:
E-status[X] is success and (T0 - E-last-response[X]) < persistence.
It should say:
E-status[X] is success and (T0 - E-last-response[X]) < E-persistence.
Notes:
The formula should reference the persistence value for the protocol in use.
Errata ID: 7832
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, HTML
Reported By: Kevin P. Fleming
Date Reported: 2024-02-29
Verifier Name: Paul Wouters
Date Verified: 2024-03-04
Section 4.6.3 says:
* E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) > damping, or
It should say:
* E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) > E-damping, or
Notes:
The formula should reference the damping value for the protocol in use.