RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (3)
RFC 9399, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 Certificates", May 2023
Source of RFC: lamps (sec)
Errata ID: 7534
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Preston Locke
Date Reported: 2023-06-05
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2023-06-05
Section 6 says:
After a certification path is successfully validated, the replying party trusts the information that the CA includes in the certificate, including any certificate extensions.
It should say:
After a certification path is successfully validated, the relying party trusts the information that the CA includes in the certificate, including any certificate extensions.
Notes:
The phrase "replying party" is a typo and should be "relying party"
Errata ID: 7535
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Preston Locke
Date Reported: 2023-06-05
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2023-06-05
Section 6 says:
Consequently, if relying party software accepts a CA, then it should be prepared to (unquestioningly) display the associated logotypes to its human user, given that it is configured to do so. Information about the logotypes is provided so that the replying party software can select the one that will best meet the needs of the human user. This choice depends on the abilities of the human user, as well as the capabilities of the platform on which the replaying party software is running.
It should say:
Consequently, if relying party software accepts a CA, then it should be prepared to (unquestioningly) display the associated logotypes to its human user, given that it is configured to do so. Information about the logotypes is provided so that the relying party software can select the one that will best meet the needs of the human user. This choice depends on the abilities of the human user, as well as the capabilities of the platform on which the relying party software is running.
Notes:
The phrases "replying party" and "replaying party" are typos and should be "relying party"
Errata ID: 7536
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Preston Locke
Date Reported: 2023-06-05
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2023-06-05
Section 6 says:
Care is needed when designing replying party software to ensure that an appropriate context of logotype information is provided.
It should say:
Care is needed when designing relying party software to ensure that an appropriate context of logotype information is provided.
Notes:
The phrase "replying party" is a typo and should be "relying party"