RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 9225, "Software Defects Considered Harmful", April 2022
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 6911
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Kyoung-Hwan Yun
Date Reported: 2022-04-01
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-04-06
Section 4 says:
4. Best Current Practises
It should say:
4. Best Current Practices
Notes:
These rest of the document uses the US spelling "practice". The reported text is inconsistent by using a British variant spelling.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
This entry has been updated from its original submission to show the correct information. Instances of "practice" should be "practise" for consistency with the British spelling used throughout.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 9225, "Software Defects Considered Harmful", April 2022
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 6910
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Joe Klein
Date Reported: 2022-04-01
Rejected by: Eliot Lear (ISE)
Date Rejected: 2022-08-21
Section 4. Best Current says:
6. In fact, assume all internal inputs also are the result of bugs.
It should say:
6. In fact, assume all internal inputs also are the result of bugs. 7. If the bug population increases after each subsequent software release, it is generally RECOMMENDED to deploy a Software Bug [BOMbs], and return when the air has cleared. [BOMbs] National Telecommunications and Information Administration, United States Department of Commerce, 2021, https://ntia.gov/SBOM
Notes:
Extend the RFC to include another best practice, associated with BOMbs.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Thanks for your thoughts. Follow-ups to this RFC are welcome, but must stand on their own merit.