RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 8932, "Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators", October 2020
Source of RFC: dprive (int)
Errata ID: 6629
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Joeri de Ruiter
Date Reported: 2021-07-05
Held for Document Update by: Eric Vyncke
Date Held: 2021-07-05
Section B.1. says:
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (>1024).
It should say:
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (<1024).
Notes:
Nonephemeral port numbers are <1024
--- Verifier note ---
The errata is indeed a real typo. As it is in appendix, "held for document update" was selected.