RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Reported (3)

RFC 8881, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol", August 2020

Source of RFC: nfsv4 (tsv)

Errata ID: 6308
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Calum Mackay
Date Reported: 2020-10-16

Section 18.32.3 says:

   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
      that committed.

It should say:

   *  The server MUST commit the data at a level at least as high as
      that requested.

Notes:

The meaning is probably obvious, but perhaps a MUST ought
to be unambiguous?

---

editorial: also, the point above this one uses the word "stronger"
where this point uses "high", both for the stability level.

The two lines should probably use the same word.

Errata ID: 6337
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Charles Lever
Date Reported: 2020-11-16

Section 18.33.1 says:

struct gss_cb_handles4 {
        rpc_gss_svc_t       gcbp_service; /* RFC 2203 */
        gsshandle4_t        gcbp_handle_from_server;
        gsshandle4_t        gcbp_handle_from_client;
};

It should say:

struct gss_cb_handles4 {
        rpc_gss_service_t   gcbp_service; /* RFC 2203 */
        gsshandle4_t        gcbp_handle_from_server;
        gsshandle4_t        gcbp_handle_from_client;
};

Notes:

RFC 2203 (and its successors) do not define rpc_gss_svc_t. I believe the rpc_gss_service_t type was intended.

Errata ID: 6611
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Seman.Shen
Date Reported: 2021-06-16

Section 18.37.3 says:

*                                             Otherwise, the error
   CB_BACK_CHAN_BUSY SHOULD be returned to indicate that there are
   CB_COMPOUNDs that need to be replied to.

It should say:

*                                                  Otherwise, the error
   NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY SHOULD be returned to indicate that there are
   CB_COMPOUNDs that need to be replied to.

Notes:

CB_BACK_CHAN_BUSY is not defined in this document.

Report New Errata