RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 8407, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", October 2018

Source of RFC: netmod (ops)

Errata ID: 5693
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Mobashshera Rasool
Date Reported: 2019-04-15
Verifier Name: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Verified: 2019-04-30

Section 4.17 says:

Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identity.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identity the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

It should say:

Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identify.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identify the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

Notes:

The word identity is not correct here. It should be identify to give the sentence correct meaning.

Errata ID: 5800
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: tom Petch
Date Reported: 2019-07-31
Verifier Name: Warren Kumari (Ops AD)
Date Verified: 2019-09-06

Section appendix b says:

       "WG Web:   <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
.....
        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

It should say:

       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
.....
        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

Notes:

Appendix A rightly says that these URL should have a scheme of https:
but Appendix B wrongly specifies http:

[WK]: I'm marking this as 'Verified' (instead of "Hold for Document Update") as it is in a template which is likely to be copied and pasted, and this seems like it may get more visibility.

Errata ID: 6899
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Mohamed Boucadair
Date Reported: 2022-03-29
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-04-06

Section Appendix A says:

   o  License -- verify that the document contains the Simplified BSD
      License in each YANG module or submodule.  Some guidelines related
      to this requirement are described in Section 3.1.  Make sure that
      the correct year is used in all copyright dates.  Use the approved
      text from the latest TLP document, which can be found at:

It should say:

   o  License -- verify that the document contains the Revised BSD
      License in each YANG module or submodule.  Some guidelines related
      to this requirement are described in Section 3.1.  Make sure that
      the correct year is used in all copyright dates.  Use the approved
      text from the latest TLP document, which can be found at:

Notes:

https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/tlp-5/ says:

==
Note: in prior versions of these provisions, the software license was erroneously called the “Simplified BSD License” rather than the “Revised BSD License”, and many documents that refer to these provisions copied the erroneous name. The IETF Trust corrected the error on September 21, 2021. The license text itself was always that of the Revised BSD License and has not changed.
==
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Verified per discussion with John Levine and individuals in the netmod WG. “Simplified” is what was used when RFC 8407 was published. However, this RFC is providing guidance for authors and reviewers of future documents.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search