RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 6767, "Ethernet-Based xDSL Multi-Pair Bonding (G.Bond/Ethernet) MIB", February 2013

Source of RFC: adslmib (ops)

Errata ID: 3589
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Edward Beili
Date Reported: 2013-04-15
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2013-04-16

Section 8 says:

IANA has assigned 264 as the object identifier for the g9982MIB 
MODULE-IDENTITY in the MIB-2 transmission sub-tree 
<http://www.iana.org/>.

It should say:

IANA has assigned 209 as the object identifier for the g9982MIB 
MODULE-IDENTITY in the MIB-2 tree <http://www.iana.org/>.

Notes:

The following changes must be made by IANA in http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml :
1. The entry for the value of 209 under mib-2 shall be changed to:
209 g9982MIB G9982-MIB [RFC6767]
2. The entry for the value of 264 under transmission sub-tree shall be changed to:
264 Reserved Reserved

Errata ID: 3590
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Edward Beili
Date Reported: 2013-04-15
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2013-04-16

Section 6 says:

    ::= { mib-2 264 }

It should say:

    ::= { mib-2 209 }

Notes:

The following changes must be made by IANA in http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml :
1. The entry for the value of 209 under mib-2 shall be changed to:
209 g9982MIB G9982-MIB [RFC6767]
2. The entry for the value of 264 under transmission sub-tree shall be changed to:
264 Reserved Reserved

Errata ID: 4417
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Yixi Lu
Date Reported: 2015-07-17
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2015-07-17

Section 6 says:

g9982BasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP
     OBJECTS {
       g9982PortCapTcTypesSupported,
       g9982PortCapBacpSupported,
       g9982PortConfTcAdminType,
       g9982PortStatTcOperType,
       g9982PortStatRxErrors,
       g9982PortStatRxSmallFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLargeFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxBadFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLostFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLostStarts,
       g9982PortStatRxLostEnds,
       g9982PortStatRxOverflows,
|      g9982BceStatTcInCodingErrors,
|      g9982BceStatTcInCrcErrors
     }
     STATUS      current

It should say:

g9982BasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP
     OBJECTS {
       g9982PortCapTcTypesSupported,
       g9982PortCapBacpSupported,
       g9982PortConfTcAdminType,
       g9982PortStatTcOperType,
       g9982PortStatRxErrors,
       g9982PortStatRxSmallFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLargeFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxBadFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLostFragments,
       g9982PortStatRxLostStarts,
       g9982PortStatRxLostEnds,
       g9982PortStatRxOverflows
     }
     STATUS      current

Notes:

"g9982BceStatTcInCodingErrors,g9982BceStatTcInCrcErrors" should not appear in g9982BasicGroup when they already exist in g9982BceGroup.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search