RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 5751, "Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification", January 2010
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8551
Source of RFC: smime (sec)
Errata ID: 2143
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jim Schaad
Date Reported: 2010-04-08
Verifier Name: Tim Polk
Date Verified: 2010-07-20
Section 3.2.2 says:
Name CMS Type Inner Content enveloped-data EnvelopedData id-data signed-data SignedData id-data certs-only SignedData none compressed-data CompressedData id-data
It should say:
Name CMS Type Inner Content enveloped-data EnvelopedData id-data signed-data SignedData id-data certs-only SignedData id-data compressed-data CompressedData id-data
Notes:
The inner content type is not an optional field. Some inner content type MUST be included, id-data is the correct inner content type to be specified.
The balance of the required information is in section 3.7. It is possible that the fact that id-data is used as the encapsulated content type should be added to the section Step 1 in 3.7
Errata ID: 2708
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jim Schaad
Date Reported: 2011-02-06
Verifier Name: Tim Polk
Date Verified: 2011-03-09
Section 3.4.3.3 says:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary=boundary42
It should say:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-1; boundary=boundary42
Notes:
In this version we updated the strings associated with the micalg parameter, however the example was not updated to use the correct new value.
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 5751, "Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification", January 2010
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8551
Source of RFC: smime (sec)
Errata ID: 4273
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Peter Gutmann
Date Reported: 2015-02-18
Section Global says:
Notes:
RFC 5751 contains several S/MIME sample messages, prefixed with the text "A sample message would be". These samples aren't actually valid S/MIME messages but merely contain 141 bytes of random garbage. In other words the S/MIME "sample messages" aren't actually sample messages.