RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Held for Document Update (3)
RFC 5695, "MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Flows", November 2009
Source of RFC: bmwg (ops)
Errata ID: 1972
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 5 (Table) says:
[...] Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS, ATM, etc. | Port Speed 1 gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. ^ Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. [...]
It should say:
[...] Port Media GigE (Gigabit Ethernet), POS, ATM, etc. | Port Speed 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps, etc. ^ Interface Encapsulation Ethernet, Ethernet VLAN, PPP, HDLC, etc. [...]
Notes:
Rationale:
Case matters for powers-of-ten indicating prefix characters in
SI unit designators; "G" = Giga (= 10^9); "g" is still undefined.
Errata ID: 1970
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 4.1.2 says:
vv | It is RECOMMENDED that all of the ports (A1, DA1, DB1, and A2) on the DUT and test tool support a dynamic Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) for routing such as IS-IS, OSPF, RIP, etc. [...]
It should say:
vvvvvvvv | It is RECOMMENDED that all of the ports (A1, DA1, DB1, and B1, etc.) on the DUT and test tool support a dynamic Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) for routing such as IS-IS, OSPF, RIP, etc. [...]
Notes:
Rationale:
The text (on top of page 6 of the RFC) should refer to all four
columns in Figure 1 (on page 4); "A2" as the name of a second entity
in the first coulumn seems to be redundant; therefore, s/A2/B1/ ;
additionally, ", etc." suggested as an indication of the other rows.
Errata ID: 1971
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 4.1.4.1 says:
(last paragraph:) MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved | label value (0-15) unless stated otherwise.
It should say:
MPLS label values used in any test case MUST be outside the reserved | label value range (0-15) unless stated otherwise. ^^^^^^^
Notes:
Rationale:
"(0-15)" is not "the reserved label value".
To avoid confusion, more precise language should be used.
Inserting "range" seems to be the smallest sensical change.