RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Held for Document Update (3)
RFC 5582, "Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework", September 2009
Source of RFC: ecrit (rai)
Errata ID: 2041
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Karl Heinz Wolf
Date Reported: 2010-02-12
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks
Section 7.1 says:
Each tree can map a location described by either civic or geographic coordinates, but not both, for one type of service (such as 'sos.police', 'sos.fire' or 'counseling') and one location profile, although nothing prevents re-using the same servers for multiple, different services or both types of coordinates. The collection of all trees for one service and location profile is known as a forest.
It should say:
Each tree can map a location described by civic and/or geographic coordinates, for one type of service (such as 'sos.police', 'sos.fire' or 'counseling'), although nothing prevents re-using the same servers for multiple, different services. The collection of all trees for one service is known as a forest.
Notes:
Trees may have mapping data in multiple location profiles, not only in a single profile. In particular, according to RFC 5222, a LoST server must understand civic and geographic coordinates. Furthermore, there is no mechanism to discover LoST servers based on the location profile.
Errata ID: 2042
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Karl Heinz Wolf
Date Reported: 2010-02-12
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks
Section 8 says:
To facilitate orientation among the trees, we introduce a forest guide (FG), which keeps track of the coverage regions of all the trees for one service and location profile.
It should say:
To facilitate orientation among the trees, we introduce a forest guide (FG), which keeps track of the coverage regions of all the trees for one service.
Notes:
Trees may have mapping data in multiple location profiles, not only in a single profile. In particular, according to RFC 5222, a LoST server must understand civic and geographic coordinates. Furthermore, there is no mechanism to discover LoST servers based on the location profile.
Errata ID: 2043
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Karl Heinz Wolf
Date Reported: 2010-02-12
Held for Document Update by: Robert Sparks
Section 3 says:
resolver: A resolver is contacted by a seeker, consults a forest mapping server, and then resolves the query using an appropriate tree. Resolvers may cache query results. tree: A tree consists of a self-contained hierarchy of authoritative mapping servers for a particular service. Each tree exports its coverage region to the forest mapping servers.
It should say:
resolver: A resolver is contacted by a seeker, consults a forest guide, and then resolves the query using an appropriate tree. Resolvers may cache query results. tree: A tree consists of a self-contained hierarchy of authoritative mapping servers for a particular service. Each tree exports its coverage region to the forest guide.
Notes:
The server should be correctly referred to as "forest guide", there is no "forest mapping server" in the architecture.