RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (3)
RFC 5569, "IPv6 Rapid Deployment on IPv4 Infrastructures (6rd)", January 2010
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 2022
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-01-26
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2013-03-16
Section 1 says:
[[ second-to-last paragraph, on mid-page 3 ]] While IPv6 availability was limited in December 2007 to only one IPv6 link per customer site (with /64 site-prefix assignments). A few months later, [...]
It should say:
| IPv6 availability was limited in December 2007 to only one IPv6 link per customer site (with /64 site-prefix assignments). A few months later, [...]
Notes:
Rationale: Incomplete sentence; strike "While" to fix.
Errata ID: 2023
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-01-26
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2013-03-16
Section 3 says:
[[ In the NOTE on top of page 6 ]] [...], and as soon as Free would get a prefix shorter than /32, this restriction would be relaxed. [...]
It should say:
[...], and as soon as Free got a prefix shorter than /32, it was possible to relax this restriction. [...]
Notes:
Rationale: Wrong temporal relationship, not matching text in Section 1.
Errata ID: 6511
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Lars Eggert
Date Reported: 2021-04-02
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2021-04-02
In the Copyright Notice, it says:
(http:trustee.ietf.org/license-info)
It should say:
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)