RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 5531, "RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2", May 2009
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9289
Source of RFC: nfsv4 (wit)
Errata ID: 4849
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: RFC Editor
Date Reported: 2016-10-31
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2016-10-31
Appendix C says:
RPCSEC_GSS 6 /* GSS-based RPC security for auth, integrity and privacy, RPC 5403 */
It should say:
RPCSEC_GSS 6 /* GSS-based RPC security for auth, integrity and privacy, RFC 5403 */
Notes:
"RPC 5403" should be "RFC 5403".
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 5531, "RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2", May 2009
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9289
Source of RFC: nfsv4 (wit)
Errata ID: 6255
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Ed Schouten
Date Reported: 2020-08-12
Section 9 says:
union reply_body switch (reply_stat stat) { case MSG_ACCEPTED: accepted_reply areply; case MSG_DENIED: rejected_reply rreply; } reply;
It should say:
union reply_body switch (reply_stat stat) { case MSG_ACCEPTED: accepted_reply areply; case MSG_DENIED: rejected_reply rreply; };
Notes:
The XDR grammar doesn't allow stating this:
union type_name switch (...) { ...} member_name;
You only have these two forms:
union type_name switch (...) { ...};
union switch (...) { ...} member_name;