Found 3 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (3)

RFC 5250, "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option", July 2008

Errata ID: 2981
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Gary Cote
Date Reported: 2011-09-28
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant
Date Held: 2012-02-21

Section 3 says:

Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.

It should say:

Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.

Notes:

Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370.
IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document.

===

The reporter is correct in his report of the error and its root cause. However this error is unlikely to cause implementation or interoperability issues and can thus wait to be fixed when the RFC is revised.

Errata ID: 2982
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Gary Cote
Date Reported: 2011-09-28
Held for Document Update by: Stewart Bryant
Date Held: 2012-02-21

Section A.2 says:

See section 7 of this document for a description of Opaque type allocation and assignment.

It should say:

See section 9 of this document for a description of Opaque type allocation and assignment.

Notes:

Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370.

IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document.

===

The reporter is correct in his report of the error and its root cause. However this error is unlikely to cause implementation or interoperability issues and can thus wait to be fixed when the RFC is revised.

Errata ID: 5287
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Angelos Vassiliou
Date Reported: 2018-03-14
Held for Document Update by: Alvaro Retana
Date Held: 2018-03-14

Section 7 says:

inter-area procedures described in Section 6 of this document.

It should say:

inter-area procedures described in Section 5 of this document.

Notes:

Inter-Area Considerations are discussed in Section 5, not Section 6.

Report New Errata