RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (3)
RFC 4938, "PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics", June 2007
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 5578
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 1027
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-20
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-07
Section 4.5 says:
| The PADQ must carry a single Metric Tag TYPE, which contains the following fields:
It should say:
| The PADQ must carry a single Metric Tag TLV, which contains the following fields:
Notes:
clarification
Errata ID: 1028
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-20
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-07
Section 6 says:
In-band credit management allows credits to be incrementally granted with each PPP Session Stage packet. These in-band incremental credit | grants are not explicitly unacknowledged. However, they are reflected in the in-band credit flow from the peer node.
It should say:
In-band credit management allows credits to be incrementally granted with each PPP Session Stage packet. These in-band incremental credit | grants are not explicitly acknowledged. However, they are reflected in the in-band credit flow from the peer node.
Notes:
I strongly suspect that in the second sentence,
"not explicitly unacknowledged"
is an erroneous double negation and should be
"not explicitly acknowledged" .
Errata ID: 1029
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-08-20
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-07
Section 6 says:
Packets received when granted credits that have been exhausted are discarded.
It should say:
When granted credits have been exhausted, any further packets received are discarded.
Notes:
That sentence does not parse. Perhaps, the word 'that' should be
deleted.
Yes - I've supplied a sentence that makes it clearer.