RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 6 records.

Status: Verified (6)

RFC 4678, "Server/Application State Protocol v1", September 2006

Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT

Errata ID: 946

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Bob Braden
Date Verified: 2008-04-21

 

   

It should say:

  -

Notes:

Section 7.3.2 says:
"o Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
for the load balancer to use. The Group Workload Manager is
stating that any polling interval smaller than the suggested
interval would probably retrieve values before they have had a
chance to change."

but it does not mention the intended *unit* for this Interval.

from pending

Errata ID: 949

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05

Section 7.5.2 says:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Set Member State Reply(0x1025)|Size of SetMemberStateReply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

It should say:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      | Set Member State Reply(0x1065)|Size of SetMemberStateReply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Notes:

Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.
Further, 7.5.1. Set Member State Request has 1060,
agreeing with section 4.2.


from pending

Errata ID: 950

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05

Section 7.3.2 says:

   o  Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
      for the load balancer to use.  The Group Workload Manager is
      stating that any polling interval smaller than the suggested
      interval would probably retrieve values before they have had a
      chance to change.

It should say:

  o  Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
      (number of seconds) for the load balancer to use.  The Group
      Workload Manager is stating that any polling interval smaller than
      the suggested  interval would probably retrieve values before they
      have had a chance to change.

Notes:

does not mention the intended *unit* for this Interval -- seconds /
centiseconds / milliseconds ???

Section 7.3 seems to say the Intervals are in seconds.

from pending

Errata ID: 951

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05

Section 7.6.2 says:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Set LB State Reply (0x1025) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

It should say:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Set LB State Reply (0x1055) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Notes:

Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.

from pending

Errata ID: 2129

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05

Section 7.6.2 says:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Set LB State Reply (0x1025) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

It should say:

      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |   Set LB State Reply (0x1055) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
      |  Return Code  |
      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Notes:

Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.

from pending

Errata ID: 20

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05

Section 7.1 says:

...will only be considered if 
the Trust flag is set while the state of the load balancer/scheduler is set.

It should say:

... will only be considered if 
the Trust flag has been set with a Set LB State message.

Notes:

also applies to section 7.2

from pending

Report New Errata