RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 4360, "BGP Extended Communities Attribute", February 2006
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7153, RFC 7606
Source of RFC: idr (rtg)
Errata ID: 1632
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yakov Rekhter
Date Reported: 2008-12-12
Verifier Name: Stewart Bryant
Date Verified: 2012-02-20
Section 7 says:
This document defines a class of extended communities called IPv4 address specific extended community for which the IANA is to create and maintain a registry entitled "IPv4 Address Specific Extended Community". All the communities in this class are of extended Types. Future assignment are to be made using the "First Come First Served" policy defined in [RFC2434]. The Type values for the transitive communities of the two-octet AS specific extended community class are 0x0100-0x01ff, and for the non-transitive communities of that class are 0x4100-0x41ff. Assignments consist of a name and the value.
It should say:
This document defines a class of extended communities called IPv4 address specific extended community for which the IANA is to create and maintain a registry entitled "IPv4 Address Specific Extended Community". All the communities in this class are of extended Types. Future assignment are to be made using the "First Come First Served" policy defined in [RFC2434]. The Type values for the transitive communities of the IPv4 Address specific extended community class are 0x0100-0x01ff, and for the non-transitive communities of that class are 0x4100-0x41ff. Assignments consist of a name and the value.
Errata ID: 1917
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yakov Rekhter
Date Reported: 2009-10-19
Verifier Name: Ross Callon
Date Verified: 2009-10-19
Section 6 says:
If a route has a non-transitivity extended community,
It should say:
If a route has a non-transitive extended community,