RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 3464, "An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications", January 2003

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 4865, RFC 5337, RFC 6533

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 2965
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bill McQuillan
Date Reported: 2011-09-09
Verifier Name: Pete Resnick
Date Verified: 2011-12-29

Section Appendix E says: 

Simple DSN

   This is a simple DSN issued after repeated attempts to deliver a
   message failed.  In this case, the DSN is issued by the same MTA from
   which the message was originated.

   Date: Thu, 7 Jul 1994 17:16:05 -0400 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
   <MAILER-DAEMON@CS.UTK.EDU> Message-Id:
   <199407072116.RAA14128@CS.UTK.EDU> Subject: Returned mail: Cannot
   send message for 5 days To: <owner-info-mime@cs.utk.edu> MIME-
   Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-
   status;
          boundary="RAA14128.773615765/CS.UTK.EDU"

   --RAA14128.773615765/CS.UTK.EDU

It should say:

Simple DSN

   This is a simple DSN issued after repeated attempts to deliver a
   message failed.  In this case, the DSN is issued by the same MTA from
   which the message was originated.

   Date: Thu, 7 Jul 1994 17:16:05 -0400 
   From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@CS.UTK.EDU> 
   Message-Id: <199407072116.RAA14128@CS.UTK.EDU> 
   Subject: Returned mail: Cannot send message for 5 days 
   To: <owner-info-mime@cs.utk.edu> 
   MIME-Version: 1.0 
   Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
          boundary="RAA14128.773615765/CS.UTK.EDU"

   --RAA14128.773615765/CS.UTK.EDU

Notes:

Apparently an unintended "Reformat Paragraph" of the top level message header.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 3464, "An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications", January 2003

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 4865, RFC 5337, RFC 6533

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 8285
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mason K
Date Reported: 2025-02-07

Section Appendix D says: 

A registration for a DSN address-type MUST include the following information:

It should say:

A registration for a DSN diagnostic-type MUST include the following information:

Notes:

Section for "IANA registration form for diagnostic-type" accidentally uses 'address-type' instead of 'diagnostic-type', incorrectly indicating that diagnostic-type information should be used for address-type registrations.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search