RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 3414, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", December 2002
Source of RFC: snmpv3 (ops)
Errata ID: 278
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Piotr Bandur
Date Reported: 2003-10-28
Section 6.3.1 says:
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 4 and calculate MD5 digest over it according to [RFC1321]. Take the first 12 octets of the final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
It should say:
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 3 and calculate MD5 digest over it according to [RFC1321]. Take the first 12 octets of the final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
Notes:
In Section 7.3.1:
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 4 and calculate SHA digest
over it according to [SHA-NIST]. Take the first 12 octets of
the final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
Should be:
4) Prepend K2 to the result of the step 3 and calculate SHA digest
over it according to [SHA-NIST]. Take the first 12 octets of
the final digest - this is Message Authentication Code (MAC).
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 3414, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", December 2002
Source of RFC: snmpv3 (ops)
Errata ID: 3612
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yitzchak M. Gottlieb
Date Reported: 2013-05-03
Held for Document Update by: Benoit Claise
Section 2.5.2 says:
maxMessageSize The maximum message size as included in the message. The User-bas User-based Security module uses this value to calculate the maxSizeResponseScopedPDU.
It should say:
maxMessageSize The maximum message size as included in the message. The User-based Security module uses this value to calculate the maxSizeResponseScopedPDU.
Notes:
The words "User-based" were moved to the second line but not fully removed from the first.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 3414, "User-based Security Model (USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)", December 2002
Source of RFC: snmpv3 (ops)
Errata ID: 5073
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Fabio Costantini
Date Reported: 2017-07-26
Rejected by: Benoit Claise
Date Rejected: 2017-07-27
Section 1.5.1 says:
When an SNMP message contains a payload which expects a response (those messages that contain a Confirmed Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the receiver of such messages is authoritative. When an SNMP message contains a payload which does not expect a response (those messages that contain an Unconfirmed Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the sender of such a message is authoritative.
It should say:
When an SNMP message contains a payload which expects a response (those messages that contain a Confirmed Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the receiver of such messages is authoritative. When an SNMP message contains a payload which does not expect a response (those messages that contain an Unconfirmed Class PDU [RFC3411]), then the sender of such a message is non-authoritative.
Notes:
In both cases the receiver was classified as "authoritative".
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The initial text says it correctly: the sender of such a message is authoritative