Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 2883, "An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP", July 2000

Errata ID: 365
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Noritoshi Demizu
Date Reported: 2004-06-21

Section 4.2.3 says:

         Transmitted    Received    ACK Sent
         Segment        Segment     (Including SACK Blocks)

         500-999        500-999     1000
         1000-1499      (data packet dropped)
         1500-1999      (delayed)
         2000-2499      (data packet dropped)
         2500-2999      (delayed)
         3000-3499      (data packet dropped)
         3500-3999      3500-3999   1000, SACK=3500-4000
         1000-1499      (data packet dropped)
         1500-2999      1500-1999   1000, SACK=1500-2000, 3500-4000
                        2000-2499   1000, SACK=2000-2500, 1500-2000,
                                            3500-4000
                        1500-2999   1000, SACK=1500-2000, 1500-3000,
                                               ---------
                                            3500-4000

It should say:

         Transmitted    Received    ACK Sent
         Segment        Segment     (Including SACK Blocks)

         500-999        500-999     1000
         1000-1499      (data packet dropped)
         1500-1999      (delayed)
         2000-2499      (data packet dropped)
         2500-2999      (delayed)
         3000-3499      (data packet dropped)
         3500-3999      3500-3999   1000, SACK=3500-4000
         1000-1499      (data packet dropped)
         1500-2999      1500-1999   1000, SACK=1500-2000, 3500-4000
                        2500-2999   1000, SACK=2500-3000, 1500-2000,
                                            3500-4000
                        1500-2999   1000, SACK=1500-2000, 1500-3000,
                                               ---------
                                            3500-4000

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 2883, "An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP", July 2000

Errata ID: 6355
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Eugene Adell
Date Reported: 2020-12-14
Held for Document Update by: Martin Duke
Date Held: 2020-12-22

Section 5.2 says:

   The use of D-SACK allows the sender to detect some cases (e.g., when
   no ACK packets have been lost) when a a Fast Retransmit was due to
   packet reordering instead of packet loss.  This allows the TCP sender

It should say:

   The use of D-SACK allows the sender to detect some cases (e.g., when
   no ACK packets have been lost) when a Fast Retransmit was due to
   packet reordering instead of packet loss.  This allows the TCP sender

Notes:

redundant word

Report New Errata