RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 2622, "Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL)", June 1999

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 4012, RFC 7909

Source of RFC: rps (ops)

Errata ID: 7564
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Jiang Li
Date Reported: 2023-07-13
Verifier Name: Warren Kumari (Ops AD)
Date Verified: 2024-01-15

Section 5.6 says:

In page 26 of RFC2622
In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2
 and 9.9.9.3.
 (7) peering-set: prng-bar
 peering: AS1 at 9.9.9.1
 peering-set: prng-foo
 peering: prng-bar
 peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1
 aut-num: AS1
 import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 }

It should say:

In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2
 and 9.9.9.3.
 (7) peering-set: prng-bar
 peering: AS3 at 9.9.9.1
 peering-set: prng-foo
 peering: prng-bar
 peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1
 aut-num: AS1
 import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 }

Notes:

As "Figure 22: Example topology consisting of three ASes, AS1, AS2, and
AS3; two exchange points, EX1 and EX2; and six routers." shows, the router 9.9.9.1 of AS1 connects to the router 9.9.9.3 of AS3 in exchange point 2. It states that "In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2 and 9.9.9.3.", so I think the corresponding AS of 9.9.9.3 should be AS3 instead of AS1.

Errata ID: 6588
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Benjamin Kaduk
Date Reported: 2021-05-20
Verifier Name: Robert Wilton
Date Verified: 2024-01-12

Throughout the document, when it says:

authenticaiton

It should say:

authentication

Notes:

The typo appears in section 3 (twice) and section 3.1 (once)

Errata ID: 8243
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Michael Lambert
Date Reported: 2025-01-06
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2025-01-07

Section 5.3 says:

5.3 Predefined Set Objects

   In a context that expects a route set (e.g.  members attribute of the
   route-set class), an AS number ASx defines the set of routes that are
   originated by ASx; and an as-set AS-X defines the set of routes that
   are originated by the ASes in AS-X. A route p is said to be
   originated by ASx if there is a route object for p with ASx as the
   value of the origin attribute.  For example, in Figure 15, the route
   set rs-special contains 128.9.0.0/16, routes of AS1 and AS2, and
   routes of the ASes in AS set AS-FOO.

   route-set: rs-special
   members: 128.9.0.0/16, AS1, AS2, AS-FOO


          Figure 15:  Use of AS numbers and AS sets in route sets.

   The set rs-any contains all routes registered in IRR. The set as-any
   contains all ASes registered in IRR.


It should say:

   In a context that expects a route set (e.g.  members attribute of the
   route-set class), an AS number ASx defines the set of routes that are
   originated by ASx; and an as-set AS-X defines the set of routes that
   are originated by the ASes in AS-X. A route p is said to be
   originated by ASx if there is a route object for p with ASx as the
   value of the origin attribute.  For example, in Figure 15, the route
   set rs-special contains 128.9.0.0/16, routes of AS1 and AS2, and
   routes of the ASes in AS set AS-FOO.

   route-set: rs-special
   members: 128.9.0.0/16, AS1, AS2, AS-FOO


          Figure 15:  Use of AS numbers and AS sets in route sets.

5.3 Predefined Set Objects

   The set rs-any contains all routes registered in IRR. The set as-any
   contains all ASes registered in IRR.

Notes:

The section header for 5.3 is misplaced. It breaks 5.2 (definition and examples of route-set) at a place that does not make sense in context. The section break should be after the caption for Figure 15. The last two sentences (beginning with "The set rs-any") are the only text referring to predefined set objects.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search