RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 9539, "Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted Recursive-to-Authoritative DNS", February 2024

Source of RFC: dprive (int)

Errata ID: 7831
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML

Reported By: Kevin P. Fleming
Date Reported: 2024-02-29
Verifier Name: Paul Wouters
Date Verified: 2024-03-04

Section 4.6.1 says:

E-status[X] is success and (T0 - E-last-response[X]) < persistence.

It should say:

E-status[X] is success and (T0 - E-last-response[X]) < E-persistence.

Notes:

The formula should reference the persistence value for the protocol in use.

Errata ID: 7832
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, HTML

Reported By: Kevin P. Fleming
Date Reported: 2024-02-29
Verifier Name: Paul Wouters
Date Verified: 2024-03-04

Section 4.6.3 says:

*  E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) >
      damping, or

It should say:

*  E-status[X] is either fail or timeout and (T0 - E-completed[X]) >
      E-damping, or

Notes:

The formula should reference the damping value for the protocol in use.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search