RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 9463, "DHCP and Router Advertisement Options for the Discovery of Network-designated Resolvers (DNR)", November 2023

Source of RFC: add (int)

Errata ID: 7784
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML

Reported By: Tomek Mrugalski
Date Reported: 2024-01-25
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2024-01-25

Section 3.1.5 says:

dohpath:  Used to supply a relative DoH URI Template (Section 5.1 of
      [RFC9461]).

It should say:

dohpath:  Used to supply a relative DoH URI Template (Section 5 of
      [RFC9461]).

Notes:

Just a minor reference correction. There is no Section 5.1 in RFC 9461. The dohpath parameter is defined in Section 5.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 9463, "DHCP and Router Advertisement Options for the Discovery of Network-designated Resolvers (DNR)", November 2023

Source of RFC: add (int)

Errata ID: 7804
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML

Reported By: David Härdeman
Date Reported: 2024-02-09

Section 6.1 says:

Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", and "Service 
Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not present if the ADN-only mode 
is used (Section 3.1.6).

It should say:

Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", "SvcParams 
Length", and "Service Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not 
present if the ADN-only mode is used (Section 3.1.6).

Notes:

The paragraph is presumably copied from section 4.1 (DHCPv6 Encrypted DNS Option), and omits the "SvcParams Length" field, which is only present in the IPv6 RA Encrypted DNS Option. Mandating the presence of a superfluous length field when using the ADN-only mode seems like an oversight.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search