RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 9132, "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification", September 2021
Source of RFC: dots (sec)
Errata ID: 7058
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Jan Lindblad
Date Reported: 2022-07-29
Verifier Name: Deb Cooley
Date Verified: 2024-05-02
Section 5.3 says:
uses data-channel:target { when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/" + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; }
It should say:
uses data-channel:target { when "../conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; }
Notes:
The original YANG statements make the "uses" statement apply to all "list scope" instances as soon as there is at least one "scope" instance that has "conflict-cause" set to "overlapping-targets". I suspect this is not the author's intent.
The corrected YANG statements make the "uses" statement only apply to the specific "scope" instances that have "conflict-cause" set to "overlapping-targets". There are also other ways to fix this issue.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 9132, "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification", September 2021
Source of RFC: dots (sec)
Errata ID: 7911
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Wolf mark
Date Reported: 2024-04-29
Rejected by: Deb Cooley
Date Rejected: 2024-05-02
Section 5.3 says:
uses data-channel:target { when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/" + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; }
It should say:
Uses data+channel:claim If "/signal-information=conflict
Notes:
Original text is outdated in the technical base
Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic technical decorum
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Incorrect