RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 9116, "A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure", April 2022

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 6946
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Edwin Balani
Date Reported: 2022-04-28
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-04-28

Section 4 says: 

   unsigned       =  *line (contact-field eol) ; one or more required
                     *line (expires-field eol) ; exactly one required
                     *line [lang-field eol] *line ; exactly one optional
                     ; order of fields within the file is not important
                     ; except that if contact-field appears more
                     ; than once, the order of those indicates
                     ; priority (see Section 3.5.3)

It should say:

   unsigned       =  *line (contact-field eol) ; one or more required
                     *line (expires-field eol) ; exactly one required
                     *line [lang-field eol] *line ; exactly one optional
                     ; order of fields within the file is not important
                     ; except that if contact-field appears more
                     ; than once, the order of those indicates
                     ; priority (see Section 2.5.3)

Notes:

Reference to Section 2.5.3 (describing ordering semantics of the Contact field) mistakenly given in ABNF comments as "Section 3.5.3"

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 9116, "A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure", April 2022

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 7264
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : HTML
Reported By: Michael Osipov
Date Reported: 2022-12-10

Section 2.5.5 says: 

Expires: 2021-12-31T18:37:07z

It should say:

Expires: 2021-12-31T18:37:07Z

Notes:

The ISO 8601 zulu indicator MUST be an upper case Z, not a lower case one.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search