RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 9116, "A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure", April 2022
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Errata ID: 6946
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT, PDF, HTML
Reported By: Edwin Balani
Date Reported: 2022-04-28
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-04-28
Section 4 says:
unsigned = *line (contact-field eol) ; one or more required *line (expires-field eol) ; exactly one required *line [lang-field eol] *line ; exactly one optional ; order of fields within the file is not important ; except that if contact-field appears more ; than once, the order of those indicates ; priority (see Section 3.5.3)
It should say:
unsigned = *line (contact-field eol) ; one or more required *line (expires-field eol) ; exactly one required *line [lang-field eol] *line ; exactly one optional ; order of fields within the file is not important ; except that if contact-field appears more ; than once, the order of those indicates ; priority (see Section 2.5.3)
Notes:
Reference to Section 2.5.3 (describing ordering semantics of the Contact field) mistakenly given in ABNF comments as "Section 3.5.3"
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 9116, "A File Format to Aid in Security Vulnerability Disclosure", April 2022
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Errata ID: 7264
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : HTML
Reported By: Michael Osipov
Date Reported: 2022-12-10
Section 2.5.5 says:
Expires: 2021-12-31T18:37:07z
It should say:
Expires: 2021-12-31T18:37:07Z
Notes:
The ISO 8601 zulu indicator MUST be an upper case Z, not a lower case one.