RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 879, "The TCP Maximum Segment Size and Related Topics", November 1983
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 7805, RFC 9293
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6691
Source of RFC: LegacyArea Assignment: tsv
Errata ID: 4053
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Susumu Endoh
Date Reported: 2014-07-17
Verifier Name: Martin Stiemerling
Date Verified: 2015-12-16
Section 14 says:
For example, if the IP Security option (11 octets) were in use and the IP maximum datagram size remained at 576 octets, then the TCP should send the MSS with a value of 525 (536-11).
It should say:
For example, if the IP Security option (11 octets) were in use and the IP maximum datagram size remained at 576 octets, then the TCP should send the MSS with a value of 524 (536-11-1).
Notes:
IP and TCP header must be multiple of 4 octets.
A side note: The value 11 for the IP security option is apparently copied from RFC 791 without considering that a padding to 32 bit word boundaries is required.
Errata ID: 7168
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Christophe Deleuze
Date Reported: 2022-10-15
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-10-17
Section 6 says:
For some networks the the directly attached network address can
It should say:
For some networks the directly attached network address can
Notes:
Duplicated word.