RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Reported (1)
RFC 8624, "Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC", June 2019
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9157
Source of RFC: dnsop (ops)
Errata ID: 6227
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mats Dufberg
Date Reported: 2020-07-10
Section 6 says:
This document has no IANA actions.
It should say:
This document updates the IANA registry "Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type Digest Algorithms". The registry has been updated by the following table from section 3.3: +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+ | Number | Mnemonics | DNSSEC Delegation | DNSSEC Validation | +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+ | 0 | NULL (CDS only) | MUST NOT [*] | MUST NOT [*] | | 1 | SHA-1 | MUST NOT | MUST | | 2 | SHA-256 | MUST | MUST | | 3 | GOST R 34.11-94 | MUST NOT | MAY | | 4 | SHA-384 | MAY | RECOMMENDED | +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+ [*] - This is a special type of CDS record signaling removal of DS at the parent in [RFC8078]. This document updates the IANA registry "DNS Security Algorithm Numbers". The registry has been updated by the following table from section 3.1: +--------+--------------------+-----------------+-------------------+ | Number | Mnemonics | DNSSEC Signing | DNSSEC Validation | +--------+--------------------+-----------------+-------------------+ | 1 | RSAMD5 | MUST NOT | MUST NOT | | 3 | DSA | MUST NOT | MUST NOT | | 5 | RSASHA1 | NOT RECOMMENDED | MUST | | 6 | DSA-NSEC3-SHA1 | MUST NOT | MUST NOT | | 7 | RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1 | NOT RECOMMENDED | MUST | | 8 | RSASHA256 | MUST | MUST | | 10 | RSASHA512 | NOT RECOMMENDED | MUST | | 12 | ECC-GOST | MUST NOT | MAY | | 13 | ECDSAP256SHA256 | MUST | MUST | | 14 | ECDSAP384SHA384 | MAY | RECOMMENDED | | 15 | ED25519 | RECOMMENDED | RECOMMENDED | | 16 | ED448 | MAY | RECOMMENDED | +--------+--------------------+-----------------+-------------------+
Notes:
The document clearly has the intention to update the IANA registers, which is also stated in the document, but not in section 6 ("IANA Considerations").