RFC Errata
Found 1 record.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 8467, "Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))", October 2018
Source of RFC: dprive (int)
Errata ID: 7874
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: hello world
Date Reported: 2024-03-28
Rejected by: Eric Vyncke
Date Rejected: 2024-04-23
Section 6 says:
Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be trivial to identify that the observed traffic is DNS.
It should say:
Note that even with encryption and padding, it might be easy to identify that the observed traffic is DNS.
Notes:
easy to understand what that means.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
While the suggested text*might* be easier to read (and as a non-English speaker easy/trivial are easy to read even if they do not convey the same semantic), it is not worth a verified errata IMHO.