RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 8407, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", October 2018

Source of RFC: netmod (ops)

Errata ID: 5693
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Mobashshera Rasool
Date Reported: 2019-04-15
Verifier Name: Ignas Bagdonas
Date Verified: 2019-04-30

Section 4.17 says:

Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identity.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identity the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

It should say:

Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identify.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identify the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

Notes:

The word identity is not correct here. It should be identify to give the sentence correct meaning.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 8407, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", October 2018

Source of RFC: netmod (ops)

Errata ID: 5800
Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: tom Petch
Date Reported: 2019-07-31

Section appendix b says:

       "WG Web:   <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
.....
        (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

It should say:

       "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
.....
        (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

Notes:

Appendix A rightly says that these URL should have a scheme of https:
but Appendix B wrongly specifies http:

Report New Errata