RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 8366, "A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols", May 2018
Source of RFC: anima (ops)
Errata ID: 6646
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Aman Mangal
Date Reported: 2021-07-22
Verifier Name: Rob Wilton
Date Verified: 2024-01-15
Section 5.2 says:
{ "ietf-voucher:voucher": { "created-on": "2016-10-07T19:31:42Z", "expires-on": "2016-10-21T19:31:42Z", "assertion": "verified", "serial-number": "JADA123456789", "idevid-issuer": "base64encodedvalue==", "pinned-domain-cert": "base64encodedvalue==", "domain-cert-revocation-checks": "true", "last-renewal-date": "2017-10-07T19:31:42Z" } }
It should say:
{ "ietf-voucher:voucher": { "created-on": "2016-10-07T19:31:42Z", "expires-on": "2016-10-21T19:31:42Z", "assertion": "verified", "serial-number": "JADA123456789", "idevid-issuer": "base64encodedvalue==", "pinned-domain-cert": "base64encodedvalue==", "domain-cert-revocation-checks": true, "last-renewal-date": "2017-10-07T19:31:42Z" } }
Notes:
domain-cert-revocation-checks is defined as boolean in the YANG specification in section 5.3 of the same RFC 8366. Boolean value in JSON are represented using true/false without the quotes.
Errata ID: 7289
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2022-12-26
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2023-01-06
Section 1 says:
This document only defines the voucher artifact, leaving it to other documents to describe specialized protocols for accessing it. Some bootstrapping protocols using the voucher artifact defined in this document include: [ZERO-TOUCH], [SECUREJOIN], and [KEYINFRA]).
It should say:
This document only defines the voucher artifact, leaving it to other documents to describe specialized protocols for accessing it. Some bootstrapping protocols using the voucher artifact defined in this document include: [ZERO-TOUCH], [SECUREJOIN], and [KEYINFRA].
Notes:
Unnecessary parenthesis at the end.
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 8366, "A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols", May 2018
Source of RFC: anima (ops)
Errata ID: 7301
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Michael Richardson
Date Reported: 2023-01-08
Held for Document Update by: Rob Wilton
Date Held: 2024-01-15
Section 5.3 says:
"The Authority Key Identifier OCTET STRING (as defined in Section 4.2.1.1 of RFC 5280) from the pledge's IDevID
It should say:
"The Authority Key Identifier OCTET STRING (as defined in Section 4.2.1.1 of [RFC5280]) from the pledge's IDevID
Notes:
The YANG module references RFC 5280 normatively, but the document does not include it as a normative reference.
This errata requires a new revision of the YANG module that cannot be done by an errata, hence moved to "Held for Document Update". In the update, I would suggesting adding a reference statement to the YANG leaf and also a normative document reference to RFC 5280.