Found 1 record.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 8223, "Application-Aware Targeted LDP", August 2017

Errata ID: 5584
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jayant Bhardwaj
Date Reported: 2018-12-27
Rejected by: James N Guichard
Date Rejected: 2023-05-31

Section 2.3.2 says:

1. The S-bit of the TAC is set to 1 or 0 to advertise or withdraw it.

It should say:

1. The E-bit of the TAC is set to 1 or 0 to advertise or withdraw it.

Notes:

My understanding of this RFC suggests that in order to Advertize or Withdraw TAC , the bit E in TAC is used. In Point # 1 of section 2.3.2, it is mentioned that bit S is used. Looks this is Editorial mistake.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
I believe this errata is inaccurate. The S-bit is part of the "Capability Parameter" TLV as defined in RFC 5561 Section 3 and the TAE is the Targeted Application Capability that is defined in RFC8223. Section 2.3.2 is correct in stating that the S-bit of the TAC is set to 1.

Report New Errata