RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 6920, "Naming Things with Hashes", April 2013

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 4248
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Matthew Kerwin
Date Reported: 2015-01-28
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2015-01-29

Section 8.2 says:

   | .well-known URL (split over 2 lines):                             |
   | http://example.com/.well-known/ni/sha256/                         |
   | UyaQV-Ev4rdLoHyJJWCi11OHfrYv9E1aGQAlMO2X_-Q                       |

It should say:

   | .well-known URL (split over 2 lines):                             |
   | http://example.com/.well-known/ni/sha-256/                        |
   | UyaQV-Ev4rdLoHyJJWCi11OHfrYv9E1aGQAlMO2X_-Q                       |

Notes:

The 'alg' part of the well-known URL should be the same as that of the ni URI ("sha-256"), but is missing the hyphen in the example.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 6920, "Naming Things with Hashes", April 2013

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 7129
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Venkatesh
Date Reported: 2022-09-13
Held for Document Update by: RFC Editor
Date Held: 2022-09-19

Section 8.1 says:

   The following ni URI is generated from the text "Hello World!" (12
   characters without the quotes), using the sha-256 algorithm shown
   with and without an authority field:

   ni:///sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk

   ni://example.com/sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk

It should say:

   The following ni URI is generated from the text "Hello World!" (12
   characters without the quotes), using the sha-256 algorithm shown
   with and without an authority field:

   ni://example.com/sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk

   ni:///sha-256;f4OxZX_x_FO5LcGBSKHWXfwtSx-j1ncoSt3SABJtkGk

Notes:

Make example consistent with the "with and without" language.

--VERIFIER NOTES--
This has been marked as held for document update per author input: co-authors […] concluded that indeed it would be more clear if the order of the examples was changed as suggested by the report.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search