Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 6773, "DCCP-UDP: A Datagram Congestion Control Protocol UDP Encapsulation for NAT Traversal", November 2012

Errata ID: 4352
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Hoffman
Date Reported: 2015-04-29
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2015-08-03

Section TOC says:

     3.9.  Service Codes and the DCCP Port Registry . . . . . . . . . 11
   4.  DCCP-UDP and Higher-Layer Protocols  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     5.1.  Protocol Identification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

It should say:

     3.9.  Service Codes and the DCCP Port Registry . . . . . . . . . 11
   4.  DCCP-UDP and Higher-Layer Protocols  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
   5.  Signalling the Use of DCCP-UDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     5.1.  Protocol Identification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Notes:

There was a processing error when generating the table of contents.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 6773, "DCCP-UDP: A Datagram Congestion Control Protocol UDP Encapsulation for NAT Traversal", November 2012

Errata ID: 4655
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Timothy Pederick
Date Reported: 2016-04-05
Held for Document Update by: Magnus Westerlund
Date Held: 2019-12-19

Section 1 says:

Network optimisations for DCCP-STP and UDP may need to be updated to 
allow these optimisations to take advantage of DCCP-UDP.

It should say:

Network optimisations for DCCP-STD and UDP may need to be updated to 
allow these optimisations to take advantage of DCCP-UDP.

Notes:

"DCCP-STP" is nowhere defined, and so is presumably a typo for "DCCP-STD".

Report New Errata