RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Reported (2)

RFC 6442, "Location Conveyance for the Session Initiation Protocol", December 2011

Source of RFC: sipcore (rai)

Errata ID: 4236

Status: Reported
Type: Technical

Reported By: Richard Appleton
Date Reported: 2015-01-19

Section 5.1, 5.2 says:

              <gbp:retransmission-allowed>false
              </gbp:retransmission-allowed>

It should say:

              <gbp:retransmission-allowed>no
              </gbp:retransmission-allowed>

Notes:

as per section 4.4

This location error is specific to having the PIDF-LO [RFC4119]
<retransmission-allowed> element set to "no". This location error is
stating it requires permission (i.e., PIDF-LO <retransmission-
allowed> element set to "yes")

and RFC4119 section 2.2.2

Errata ID: 5027

Status: Reported
Type: Technical

Reported By: Larry Reeder
Date Reported: 2017-05-31

Section 5.1 says:

 --boundary1

   Content-Type: application/pidf+xml
   Content-ID: <target123@atlanta.example.com>
   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
       <presence

It should say:

 --boundary1

   Content-Type: application/pidf+xml
   Content-ID: <target123@atlanta.example.com>

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
       <presence

Notes:

The PIDF-LO examples in RFC 6442 don't have an empty line between the message headers and the message body in the pidf+xml bodies.

RFC 2046, section 5.1 says this about multipart MIME body parts: " After its boundary delimiter line, each body part then consists of a header area, a blank line, and a body area".

This errata also applies to the example in section 5.2

Report New Errata