Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 5568, "Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers", July 2009

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7411

Errata ID: 1816
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Rajeev Koodli
Date Reported: 2009-07-23
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-06-06

Section 6.4.2 says:

Type: 17

It should say:

Type: 34 

Notes:

The Type value for the Mobility Header IPv6 Address/Prefix option should have been updated to 34 upon IANA assignment.

Errata ID: 1943
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Rajeev Koodli
Date Reported: 2009-11-19
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-06-06

Section 6.2.1.2 says:

   Upon receiving an HI message, the NAR MUST respond with a Handover
   Acknowledge message.  If the 'S' flag is set in the HI message, the
   NAR SHOULD include the New Care-of Address option and a Code 3.

It should say:

   Upon receiving an HI message, the NAR MUST respond with a Handover
   Acknowledge message.  If the 'S' flag is set in the HI message, the
   NAR SHOULD include the New Care-of Address option and a Code 2.

Notes:

Code 2 is used in assigned addressing. Some Codes were cleaned up in 5068/5568, but this was not reflected in above text

Errata ID: 1944
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Rajeev Koodli
Date Reported: 2009-11-19
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-04-26

Section 6.4.6 says:

2: NCoA is invalid, use the supplied NCoA.  The supplied NCoA
(in the form of an IP Address Option) MUST be present following
the Reserved field.

It should say:

2: NCoA is invalid, use the supplied NCoA. The supplied NCoA 
(an IPv6 Address of 16 octets) MUST be present following the 
Reserved field.

Notes:

Clarifies that an IPv6 address is included (and not IPv6 address/prefix option)

Report New Errata