RFC Errata
Found 6 records.
Status: Verified (6)
RFC 4678, "Server/Application State Protocol v1", September 2006
Source of RFC: INDEPENDENT
Errata ID: 946
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Bob Braden
Date Verified: 2008-04-21
It should say:
-
Notes:
Section 7.3.2 says:
"o Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
for the load balancer to use. The Group Workload Manager is
stating that any polling interval smaller than the suggested
interval would probably retrieve values before they have had a
chance to change."
but it does not mention the intended *unit* for this Interval.
from pending
Errata ID: 949
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05
Section 7.5.2 says:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set Member State Reply(0x1025)|Size of SetMemberStateReply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set Member State Reply(0x1065)|Size of SetMemberStateReply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.
Further, 7.5.1. Set Member State Request has 1060,
agreeing with section 4.2.
from pending
Errata ID: 950
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05
Section 7.3.2 says:
o Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
for the load balancer to use. The Group Workload Manager is
stating that any polling interval smaller than the suggested
interval would probably retrieve values before they have had a
chance to change.
It should say:
o Interval: These two bytes indicate a recommended polling interval
(number of seconds) for the load balancer to use. The Group
Workload Manager is stating that any polling interval smaller than
the suggested interval would probably retrieve values before they
have had a chance to change.
Notes:
does not mention the intended *unit* for this Interval -- seconds /
centiseconds / milliseconds ???
Section 7.3 seems to say the Intervals are in seconds.
from pending
Errata ID: 951
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05
Section 7.6.2 says:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set LB State Reply (0x1025) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set LB State Reply (0x1055) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.
from pending
Errata ID: 2129
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05
Section 7.6.2 says:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set LB State Reply (0x1025) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set LB State Reply (0x1055) | Size of Set LB State Reply TLV|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Return Code |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
Assuming the correct values are in section 4.2.
from pending
Errata ID: 20
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-15
Verifier Name: Nevil Brownlee
Date Verified: 2010-04-05
Section 7.1 says:
...will only be considered if the Trust flag is set while the state of the load balancer/scheduler is set.
It should say:
... will only be considered if the Trust flag has been set with a Set LB State message.
Notes:
also applies to section 7.2
from pending