RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 4 records.

Status: Verified (4)

RFC 4532, "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) "Who am I?" Operation", June 2006

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 65
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-07-06
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2010-09-02

Section 3 says:

   Servers indicate their support for this extended operation by
   providing a whoamiOID object identifier as a value of the
   'supportedExtension' attribute type in their root DSE.  The server
   SHOULD advertise this extension only when the client is willing and
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^
   able to perform this operation.   

It should say:

   Servers indicate their support for this extended operation by
   providing a whoamiOID object identifier as a value of the
   'supportedExtension' attribute type in their root DSE.  The server
   SHOULD advertise this extension only when it is willing
                                             ^^
   and able to perform this operation.

Notes:

As far as I can see, the last sentence there is misleading and
does not match the operational scenario; and hence, it should be
clarified. According to the recommendations given, the client
will not try the operation if the OID is not offered by the server,
and hence the server cannot know whether the client is willing
to send the whoami Request; and in this case, the *server* will
perform the operation, i.e., send the whoami Response.

Errata ID: 7195
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Ivan Panchenko
Date Reported: 2022-10-30
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-10-31

Section 1 says:

   specification, the term "the authorization identity" and "the
   authzId" are generally to be read as "the primary authorization
   identity" and the "the primary authzId", respectively.

It should say:

   specification, the term "the authorization identity" and "the
   authzId" are generally to be read as "the primary authorization
   identity" and "the primary authzId", respectively.

Notes:

Doubled "the".

Errata ID: 7196
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Ivan Panchenko
Date Reported: 2022-10-30
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-10-31

Section 4.1 says:

   When a Proxied Authorization Control is be attached to the "Who am

It should say:

   When a Proxied Authorization Control is attached to the "Who am

Notes:

Erroneous "be".

Errata ID: 7197
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Ivan Panchenko
Date Reported: 2022-10-30
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2022-10-31

Section 7 says:

   The LDAP "Who am I?" operation takes it's name from the UNIX

It should say:

   The LDAP "Who am I?" operation takes its name from the UNIX

Notes:

The possessive form of "it" should be written without an apostrophe.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search