RFC Errata


Errata Search
 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 4 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 4217, "Securing FTP with TLS", October 2005

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8996

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 800
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-09
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-01

Section 12.5 says: 

"...  This contrasts the with situation when ..."

It should say:

"...  This contrasts with the situation when ..."

Notes:

from pending

Errata ID: 803
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-09
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-01

Section 12.5 says: 

 "o  The various people who have help author this document ..."

It should say:

"o  The various people who have helped [to] author this document ..."

or:

"o  The various people who have helped the author of this document ..."

Notes:

from pending

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 4217, "Securing FTP with TLS", October 2005

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8996

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 165
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-09
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov

Abstract says:

This document
   is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that
   provided for SMTP in RFC 2487, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure
   SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading
   to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.".

It should say:

This document
   is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that
   provided for SMTP in RFC 3207, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure
   SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading
   to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.".

Notes:


the remainder of the text (including the References section)
correctly refers to RFC 3207 that once had obsoleted RFC 2487

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 4217, "Securing FTP with TLS", October 2005

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8996

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: app

Errata ID: 7294
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mikael A
Date Reported: 2022-12-31
Rejected by: Orie Steele
Date Rejected: 2024-03-29

The abstract says:

   This document
   is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that
   provided for SMTP in RFC 2487, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure
   SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading
   to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.".

It should say:

   This document
   is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that
   provided for SMTP in RFC 3207, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure
   SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading
   to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.".

Notes:

Upgrade?
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The text was correct at the time of publishing, and the datatracker conveys that RFC 2487 was obsoleted by RFC 3207

Report New Errata



Advanced Search