Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 4090, "Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels", May 2005

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8271, RFC 8537, RFC 8796

Errata ID: 4203
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yakov Rekhter
Date Reported: 2014-12-17
Verifier Name: Alia Atlas
Date Verified: 2015-01-06

Section 6 says:

Whenever the PLR has a backup path available, the PLR MUST set
the "local protection available" flag.

It should say:

Whenever the PLR has a backup path available, the PLR MUST set
the "local protection available" flag.  For example, if the PLR 
has determined to use a bypass tunnel and set up the necessary 
local forwarding state to be able to use it as a backup path, 
then that PLR has a backup path available.

Notes:

In the case of facility-based FRR the PLR must set the "local protection available" flag if it has the bypass tunnel available and the local forwarding state is set up.

Errata ID: 6203
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Mihir Amrelia
Date Reported: 2020-06-03
Verifier Name: Deborah Brungard
Date Verified: 2021-02-26

Section 6 says:

If the "bandwidth protection guaranteed" flag is set, the PLR SHOULD try to
provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR SHOULD then try
to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.

It should say:

If the "bandwidth protection desired" flag is set in SESSION_ATTRIBUTE, the PLR
SHOULD try to provide a bandwidth guarantee; if this is not feasible, the PLR
SHOULD then try to provide a backup without a guarantee of the full bandwidth.

Notes:

Correcting flag name.

Errata ID: 6939
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Igor Malyushkin
Date Reported: 2022-04-20
Verifier Name: Andrew Alston
Date Verified: 2022-05-26

Section 4.4 says:

To report whether bandwidth and/or node protection are provided as requested, we define two new flags in the RRO IPv4 sub-object.

It should say:

To report whether bandwidth and/or node protection are provided as requested, we define two new flags in the RRO IPv4 sub-object and RRO IPv6 sub-object.

Notes:

Forgotten IPv6 sub-object. The title of the section implies the usage of both versions of IP protocol. Later in this section (and the document), both sub-objects are also referred to.

Report New Errata