RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 2863, "The Interfaces Group MIB", June 2000

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8892

Source of RFC: ifmib (int)

Errata ID: 4820
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Christopher L Marshall
Date Reported: 2016-10-05
Verifier Name: Éric Vyncke
Date Verified: 2024-01-12

Section 3.1.7 says:

   Network speeds are increasing.  The range of ifSpeed is limited to
   reporting a maximum speed of (2**31)-1 bits/second, or approximately
   2.2Gbs.  SONET defines an OC-48 interface, which is defined at
   operating at 48 times 51 Mbs, which is a speed in excess of 2.4Gbs.
   Thus, ifSpeed is insufficient for the future, and this memo defines
   an additional object: ifHighSpeed.

It should say:

   Network speeds are increasing.  The range of ifSpeed is limited to
   reporting a maximum speed of (2**32)-1 bits/second, or approximately
   4.3Gbs.  SONET defines an OC-48 interface, which is defined at
   operating at 48 times 51 Mbs, which is a speed in excess of 2.4Gbs.
   Thus, ifSpeed is insufficient for the future, and this memo defines
   an additional object: ifHighSpeed.

Notes:

RFC 3635, in section 3.2.8 quotes RFC2863 as if it were using the correct 4.3Gbps value: "For these speeds, ifSpeed should report a maximum unsigned 32-bit value of 4,294,967,295 as specified in [RFC2863]."

-- Verifier note --

Indeed https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2578#section-7.1.6 states that Gauge32 has a max of 4.3 Gbps (in this case). Noting that this value renders the justification of ifHighSpeed not relevant but nowadays network speeds are much higher anyway than 4.3 Gbps

Report New Errata



Advanced Search