RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 2131, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", March 1997

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 3396, RFC 4361, RFC 5494, RFC 6842

Source of RFC: dhc (int)

Errata ID: 7776
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Imrane
Date Reported: 2024-01-23
Rejected by: Eric Vyncke
Date Rejected: 2024-04-23

Section 4.3.1 says:

Client identifier         MUST NOT     MUST NOT           MAY

It should say:

Client identifier         MUST NOT     MUST NOT           MUST NOT

Notes:

In the "Options" list in Table 3 ("Fields and options used by DHCP server"), the "Client identifier" option has "MUST NOT" for both DHCPOFFER and DHCPACK; however, for DHCPNAK, it has "MAY".

"Client identifier" should be a "MUST NOT" for DHCPNAK as well.

It seems that the field should only be used by a client and never by a server, and if that's true for the OFFER and ACK, then it should be even more correct for the NAK.

"Vendor class identifier" has a MAY for all three messages, so maybe it was a typo in the previous option because of the repetitive input in the next one.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
RFC 6842 has addressed this problem with more information than a simple errata.

I.e., the problem in RFC 2131 exists indeed but has been fixed.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search