RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 6275, "Mobility Support in IPv6", July 2011

Source of RFC: mext (int)

Errata ID: 3235

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alastair Galloway
Date Reported: 2012-05-30
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-05-30

Section 4.1 says:

The mobile node may also accept packets from several care-of
addresses, such as when it is moving but still reachable at the
previous link.

It should say:

The mobile node may also accept packets for several care-of
addresses, such as when it is moving but still reachable at the
previous link.

Notes:

Looks like a typo ("from" typed, instead of "for"), but affects the technical meaning. I am happy for this erratum to be changed to Type: Editorial.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 6275, "Mobility Support in IPv6", July 2011

Source of RFC: mext (int)

Errata ID: 5083

Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Mikael Abrahamsson
Date Reported: 2017-08-10

Throughout the document, when it says:


Notes:

Section 7.2 of RFC6275 introduces a new flag, called the R bit. This seems to update RFC 4861 section 4.6.2. However, there is no mention in RFC6275 or in RFC4861 that this happened.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×