errata logo graphic

Found 1 record.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC5919, "Signaling LDP Label Advertisement Completion", August 2010

Source of RFC: mpls (rtg)

Errata ID: 2475

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-08-19
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel

Section 5.3,1st para says:

   When an LDP speaker receives a Label Request message for a Typed
|  Wildcard FEC (e.g., a particular FEC Element Type) from a peer, the
   LDP speaker determines the set of bindings (as per any local
   filtering policy) to advertise to the peer for the FEC type specified
   by the request.  [...]

It should say:

   When an LDP speaker receives a Label Request message for a Typed
|  Wildcard FEC (i.e., a particular FEC Element Type) from a peer, the
   LDP speaker determines the set of bindings (as per any local
   filtering policy) to advertise to the peer for the FEC type specified
   by the request.  [...]

Notes:

The parenthetical clause does not give an example, it gives
an explanation; therefore, to avoid confusion, s!e.g.!i.e.!

Note: Same issue as addressed by EID=2473 for RFC 5918.


Report New Errata