RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 5780, "NAT Behavior Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", May 2010

Source of RFC: behave (tsv)

Errata ID: 2844

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: John Selbie
Date Reported: 2011-06-25
Verifier Name: Wes Eddy
Date Verified: 2011-06-27

Section 7.5 says:

RESPONSE-PORT is a 16-bit unsigned integer in network byte order 
followed by 2 bytes of padding. Allowable values of RESPONSE-PORT 
are 0-65536.

It should say:

RESPONSE-PORT is a 16-bit unsigned integer in network byte order 
followed by 2 bytes of padding. Allowable values of RESPONSE-PORT 
are 0-65535.

Notes:

The 16-bit unsigned int range is 0-65535 (0x0000 - 0xffff). 65536 can't be represented inside a a 16-bit.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 5780, "NAT Behavior Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", May 2010

Source of RFC: behave (tsv)

Errata ID: 2939

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported By: John Selbie
Date Reported: 2011-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Wes Eddy
Date Held: 2012-04-27

Section 9.1 says:

Section 9.1
   ...
   0x802c: OTHER-ADDRESS
   

Notes:

The document contradicts itself, one place (section 7.4) saying that OTHER-ADDRESS has the same value as CHANGED-ADDRESS did, and the other place (section 9.1) giving a new value, which matches the IANA registry. The statement explaining why it has the same value (which it doesn't) should be removed.

Errata ID: 4327

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Xinbang Hu
Date Reported: 2015-04-03
Held for Document Update by: Spencer Dawkins
Date Held: 2016-01-13

Section 3.6 says:

This test apples to UDP and TCP, but not TLS over TCP connections.

It should say:

This test applies to UDP and TCP, but not TLS over TCP connections.

Notes:

"apples" should be "applies".

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×