Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC5598, "Internet Mail Architecture", July 2009

Errata ID: 3260

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Murray Kucherawy
Date Reported: 2012-06-15
Verifier Name: Barry Leiba
Date Verified: 2012-06-15

Section 4.3.1 says:

4.3.1. Mail Submission Agent (MSA)


   A Mail Submission Agent (MSA) accepts the message submitted by the
   aMUA and enforces the policies of the hosting ADMD and the
   requirements of Internet standards.

It should say:

4.3.1. Message Submission Agent (MSA)


   A Message Submission Agent (MSA) accepts the message submitted by the
   aMUA and enforces the policies of the hosting ADMD and the
   requirements of Internet standards.

Notes:

The document tends to use "Message" rather than "Mail". However, in the case of the MSA, it uses "Mail" more than "Message".

The document probably needs a pass to ensure consistent use of both terms throughout.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC5598, "Internet Mail Architecture", July 2009

Errata ID: 2956

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported By: Dave Crocker
Date Reported: 2011-09-03
Held for Document Update by: Peter Saint-Andre

Section 4 says:

Figure 5: Protocols and Services, MTA-hMDA list of protocols

It should say:

{{ The text in Section 4.4 cites the two, standards-track 'turn' mechanisms, but these are not listed in the MTA-hMDA link of Figure 5. }}

Notes:

Clearly this is a non-critical enhancement. Still, it would be good to add whenever the document is updated.

Errata ID: 3282

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alessandro Vesely
Date Reported: 2012-07-11
Held for Document Update by: Barry Leiba

Section 2.3 says:

Mail Service Providers (MSPs)

It should say:

either:
   Mailbox Providers (MPs)
or:
   Email Service Providers (ESPs)

Notes:

The ambiguity between the two concepts possibly indicated with similar terms is frequent. The distinction reported here is due to JD Falk, and it seems to be taking roots.

Report New Errata