errata logo graphic

Found 4 records.

Status: Verified (4)

RFC4877, "Mobile IPv6 Operation with IKEv2 and the Revised IPsec Architecture", April 2007

Source of RFC: mip6 (int)

Errata ID: 910

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-04-16
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02

Section 3 says:

   The packet formats for tunneled mobile prefix discovery messages are
   very similar to the tunneled Binding Update and Binding
   Acknowledgment with the with the home address as the source address
   in the inner IP header.

It should say:

   The packet formats for tunneled mobile prefix discovery messages are
   very similar to the tunneled Binding Update and Binding
   Acknowledgment with the home address as the source address in the
   inner IP header.

Notes:

from pending


Errata ID: 911

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-04-16
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02

Section 4.2 says:

   o  The home agent MUST use the Type 2 Routing header in Binding
      Acknowledgements and Mobile Prefix Advertisements sent to the
      mobile node when transport mode IPsec protection is used, again
      due to the need to have the home address visible when the policy
      checks are made.

It should say:

   o  The home agent MUST use the Type 2 Routing header in Binding
      Acknowledgements and Mobile Prefix Advertisements sent to the
      mobile node when transport mode IPsec protection is used, again
      due to the need to have the home address be visible when the
      policy checks are made.

Notes:

omission of verb

from pending


Errata ID: 912

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-04-16
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02

Section 4.3 says:

          [...].  The use of sequence number in the ESP header to
      provide anti-replay protection is optional because the sequence
      numbers in the Binding Updates provide anti-replay protection.

It should say:

          [...].  The use of the sequence number in the ESP header to
      provide anti-replay protection is optional because the sequence
      numbers in the Binding Updates provide anti-replay protection.

Notes:

missing article

from pending


Errata ID: 913

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-04-16
Verifier Name: RFC Editor
Date Verified: 2007-11-02

Section 5 says:

                   [...].  This case uses IPsec tunnel mode SA with the
       protocol selector set to 'any'.

It should say:

                   [...].  This case uses IPsec tunnel mode SAs with
       the protocol selector set to 'any'.

Notes:

SA --> SAs

from pending


Report New Errata