RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 4 records.

Status: Verified (4)

RFC 4866, "Enhanced Route Optimization for Mobile IPv6", May 2007

Source of RFC: mipshop (int)

Errata ID: 601

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-14
Verifier Name: Christian Vogt
Date Verified: 2007-06-25

Section 4.2 says:

   If the Binding Update message is authenticated based on the CGA  
   property of the mobile node's home address or by a proof of the
   mobile node's knowledge of a permanent home keygen token, the
   lifetime for the binding SHOULD be set to the maximum of
                                                 ^^^^^^^
   MAX_CGA_BINDING_LIFETIME and the value specified in the Lifetime
   field of the Binding Update message.

It should say:

   If the Binding Update message is authenticated based on the CGA
   property of the mobile node's home address or by a proof of the
   mobile node's knowledge of a permanent home keygen token, the
   lifetime for the binding SHOULD be set to the minimum of
                                                 ^^^^^^^      
   MAX_CGA_BINDING_LIFETIME and the value specified in the Lifetime
   field of the Binding Update message.

Notes:

Page 21, 1st paragraph

Errata ID: 602

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-14
Verifier Name: Christian Vogt
Date Verified: 2007-06-25

Section 4.2 says:

                                          If the Binding Update message
   is authenticated through a proof of the mobile node's reachability at
   the home address, then the lifetime for the binding SHOULD be set to
   the maximum of MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFETIME [1] and the value specified in
       ^^^^^^^
   the Lifetime field of the Binding Update message.


It should say:

                                          If the Binding Update message
   is authenticated through a proof of the mobile node's reachability at
   the home address, then the lifetime for the binding SHOULD be set to
   the minimum of MAX_RR_BINDING_LIFETIME [1] and the value specified in
       ^^^^^^^
   the Lifetime field of the Binding Update message.

Notes:

Page 21, 1st paragraph

Errata ID: 4

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-14
Verifier Name: Christian Vogt
Date Verified: 2007-06-25

Section 6.2 says:

                                                           Enhanced
    Router Optimization does not make assumptions on the relationship
    ^^^^^^
    between mobile and correspondent nodes.

It should say:

                                                           Enhanced
    Route Optimization does not make assumptions on the relationship
    ^^^^^  
    between mobile and correspondent nodes.

Notes:

Page 43, 1st paragraph

Errata ID: 603

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-05-14
Verifier Name: Christian Vogt
Date Verified: 2007-06-25

Section 4.2 says:

                                                       The correspondent
    node may in either case grant a further reduced lifetime, but it MUST
         ^^^
    NOT accept a higher lifetime.

It should say:

                                                       The correspondent
    node MAY in either case grant a further reduced lifetime, but it MUST
         ^^^
    NOT accept a higher lifetime.

Notes:

Page 21, 1st paragraph

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×