errata logo graphic

Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC4335, "The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension", January 2006

Source of RFC: secsh (sec)

Errata ID: 1309

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-02-05
Held for Document Update by: Pasi Eronen

Section 3, 1st para says:

   The following channel-specific request can be sent over a session
   channel (as described in [4]) to request that the remote host perform
   a BREAK operation.

It should say:

   The following channel-specific request can be sent over a session
|  channel (as described in [5]) to request that the remote host perform
   a BREAK operation.

Notes:

The relevant information is in RFC 4254 [5], "SSH Connection Protocol",
in particular sections 5 and 6.
RFC 4253 [4] does not even mention the concept of session channels
to any notable detail.


Errata ID: 1310

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-02-05
Held for Document Update by: Pasi Eronen

Section 3, last para says:

   If the 'want_reply' boolean is set, the server MUST reply using an
   SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS or SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE [5] message.  If a
   BREAK of any kind was preformed, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS MUST be
   sent.  If no BREAK was preformed, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE MUST be
   sent.

It should say:

   If the 'want_reply' boolean is set, the server MUST reply using an
   SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS or SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE [5] message.  If a
|  BREAK of any kind was performed, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS MUST be
|  sent.  If no BREAK was performed, SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE MUST be
   sent.

Notes:

s/preformed/performed/g


Report New Errata